On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dave Page <[email protected]> writes:
>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> I'm betting not, because I don't see any support for copying their
>>> values down to child processes in
>>> write_nondefault_variables/read_nondefault_variables.
>
>> Correct, it does not.
>
> OK.  I can fix that while I'm busy hacking on guc.c.  Does anyone care
> enough about this to think it should be back-patched?

I think it's worthwhile if the patch can be applied fairly easily to
the older branches. If not, I don't think it's worth worrying about.

-- 
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to