Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of vie oct 14 12:12:22 -0300 2011: > > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > The guideline, last I checked, was that before getting into coding any > > item from the TODO list, the prospective hacker should check previous > > discussions and initiate a new one on this list to ensure consensus. > > Unless something is blatantly "not wanted", I don't think it should be > > removed from the TODO list. There not being consensus does not mean > > that there cannot ever be. > > OK. But if we are pretty sure we don't want something, e.g. hibernate, > we shouldn't add it. If we're so sure we don't want it, we could add it to the "features we do not want" section. But as Robert says downthread, I don't see us being so sure that we don't want hibernation. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers