Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
> > Oops, I see a problem. Right now, our first major release has no zero,
> > e.g. 9.2, while our minors have a third digit, 9.2.5. The problem is
> > that with this patch it is confusing to have a psql config file that
> > matches 9.2.0, but not 9.2.5, because you can't write 9.2.0.
>
> Uh, this seems like nonsense. We've been labeling major releases with
> a dot-zero for some time, and that's embedded in process now (cf
> version_stamp.pl) to the point that we're unlikely to forget to do so.
Ah, I see now. 9.1 has:
#define PG_VERSION "9.1.0"
I rarely see the non-dev trees. No problem then.
Patch applied.
--
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
