On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:18 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Any reason or objection to committing this patch?
The checkpointer doesn't call pgstat_send_bgwriter(), but it should. Otherwise, some entries in pg_stat_bgwriter will never be updated. If we adopt the patch, checkpoint is performed by checkpointer. So it looks odd that information related to checkpoint exist in pg_stat_bgwriter. We should move them to new catalog even if it breaks the compatibility? Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
