On 19 October 2011 05:20, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: >> I wouldn't add extra special checks for that. It might not be >> completely unreasonable to have a standby that no one can connect to, >> for example. > > Well, you couldn't monitor its state then, so I don't find that example > very convincing. But if you were intent on having that, you could > easily set up a pg_hba file containing only "reject" entries.
I hadn't noticed you'd committed some changes around this until now. Thanks. -- Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ixion Registered Linux user: #516935 EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
