Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 13:19, Heikki Linnakangas > <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> On 27.10.2011 14:09, Fujii Masao wrote: >>> Yes. But that sounds unuserfriendly. Padding the WAL file manually >>> is easy-to-do for a user?
> I'd definitely want to avoid anything that requires pg_receivexlog to > actually *parse* the WAL. That'll make it way more complex than I'd > like. What parsing? Just pad to 16MB with zeroes. In fact, I think the receiver should just create the file that size to start with, and then write received data into it, much like normal WAL creation does. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers