On Oct 27, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > So I'm going to go off and do that, but I wonder whether anyone thinks > this is sufficiently important to back-patch. I'm inclined to think > that back-patching isn't a good idea, because changing the > representation of PLpgSQL_stmt_if will break (at least) EDB's plpgsql > debugger; ISTM the number of complaints isn't enough to warrant doing > that in released branches.
+1 to not back-patching. Seems like it doesn't come up all that often, right Best, David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
