Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes:
> I just noticed it was pulling from pg_depend and we could be creating
> multiple dependencies on a single sequence by having two tables use it
> as a default value. If that situation doesn't cause a problem for this,
> then that's fine. :) Couldn't remember if we distinguished 'owned by'
> from 'dependend upon' for seqeunces.
Yeah, we do, via the deptype. The check for deptype = 'a' is the
correct thing here.
Still, I'm not terribly comfortable with having multiple matches be
treated as a reason to fail the entire \d command. It'd likely be
better to just not add a footer if you get an unexpected number of
matches.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
