I'm looking for known problem areas in btree_gist. I see:
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/8973.1286841...@sss.pgh.pa.us
With Range Types, I'm anticipating that btree_gist will become more
important, so I'd like to know what bugs are holding it back.
So, anything else come to mind? Or does btree_gist just need a good
review? Or have the problems been fixed?
Regards,
Jeff Davis
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
