Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: > Please also see earlier discussions of these items in the mailing list.
Yes. It's very unlikely that we'll accept a patch that just moves xslt_process into core without doing anything about its definitional and implementation shortcomings. See for instance http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-02/msg01878.php regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
