On 11/8/11 1:23 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote: > So the question is, would a > patch which does the first two without the third be accepted by the > community?
AFAIC, yes. For that matter, Part 3 is useful without parts 1 and 2, if someone wanted to work on that. I recall some academic work on automated materialized view matching back in the 7.2 days. And I can help test whatever you come up with ... I do a lot of matviews. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
