> > Yeah thanks, that does the object locking. For pre-9.1 versions, we will > > need a similar solution. I encountered the issue on 8.3.x.. > > I don't think we should back-patch a fix of this type. There is a lot > of cruftiness of this type scattered throughout the code base, and if > we start back-patching all the fixes for it, we're going to end up > destabilizing older branches for little real benefit. > > Ok, understood.
Thanks and Regards, Nikhils
