Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes:
> On Wednesday, November 9, 2011, Albe Laurenz wrote:
>> Is the following proposal acceptable:
>>
>> - Add a GUC ssl_compression, defaulting to "on".
>> - Add a client option "sslcompression" and an environment variable
>> PGSSLCOMPRESSION, defaulting to "1".
> Seems like the reasonable thing, yes.
A GUC is entirely, completely, 100% the wrong answer. It has no way to
deal with the fact that some clients may need compression and others
not.
It should be a client option, full stop. The fact that that will be
more work to implement does not make "kluge it at the server" the right
answer.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
