Steve Singer <ssin...@ca.afilias.info> writes:
> On 11-11-10 02:00 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... Oh, I see, the problem is that&labels[-1] might not compare to
>> &labels[0] the way we want. I think only the first hunk of your
>> patch is actually necessary.
> Yes the problem is still fixed if I only apply the first hunk.
OK, everything seems satisfactorily explained then. Will commit the
fix, thanks for the report!
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
