Stephen Frost <[email protected]> writes:
> * Tom Lane ([email protected]) wrote:
>> To actually get rid of acldefault, we'd have to do that not only for
>> types but for all objects with ACLs. That's a LOT of catalog bulk,
>> and like Robert I'm not seeing much benefit. It's not unreasonable
>> to want the typical case to be small and fast.
> A LOT of catalog bulk..? Am I missing something here?
What I'm missing is what actual benefit we get from spending the extra
space. (No, I don't believe that changing the defaults is something
that users commonly will or should do; it's certainly not the case to
optimize for.)
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
