On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 15:32, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Kerem Kat <kerem...@gmail.com> writes: >> Corresponding is currently implemented in the parse/analyze phase. If >> it were to be implemented in the planning phase, explain output would >> likely be as you expect it to be. > > It's already been pointed out to you that doing this at parse time is > unacceptable, because of the implications for reverse-listing of rules > (views). > > regards, tom lane >
I am well aware of that thank you. Regards, Kerem KAT -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
