> Purpose is to provide consistent WAL writes, even when WALInsertLock > contended. Currently no "off" option, thinking is that the overhead of > doing this is relatively low and so it can be "always on" - exactly as > it is for sync rep.
Hmmm, have you had a chance to do any performance tests? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
