Excerpts from Florian Weimer's message of jue nov 24 11:31:29 -0300 2011: > > * Alvaro Herrera: > > > I think we should just propose something that will not work in JDBC. > > I'm not sure if this is a good idea. 8-) > > I plan to add UNIX Domain socket support to the JDBC driver. > Eventually, the JDK will expose UNIX Domain sockets to Java code, too > (they are already used internally for management functions).
Well, in that case, the JDBC could simply adopt whatever syntax that libpq ends up adopting. I just meant "something that will not work in JDBC *right now*" (i.e. with no local socket support). -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
