Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've been running a few functions within schema's. It's annoying that
> everything needs to be qualified as it doesn't allow the functions to be
> moved very easily.
> Would it be appropriate for the function to have it's own schema as
> pre-pended onto the user path while in the users function?
Hmm. I can think of examples where you wouldn't want that (because
the function *should* see the caller's namespace) about as easily
as cases where you would.
If a function wants to access "its own schema", why shouldn't it
use qualified references?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
