2011/12/8 Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com>: > On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> 2011/12/7 Kevin Grittner <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov>: >>> Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I can upgrade - it's not problem - just it is surprise for me - >>>> because documentation is not related to mayor version. Maybe this >>>> issue can be documented somewhere >>> >>> Don't the release notes, mentioning that the bug is fixed in 9.1.2, >>> cover that? >> >> It is little bit difficult detect this issue as bug > > It's not a bug. It's an not-forward-compatible behavior change in a > minor release.
so this can be mentioned in documentation elsewhere than release notes - the best is near related examples - it is different behave than postgresql's user expect. I understand to reason now - and it has sense - but it is surprising - not all has newer postgres - this version is mostly in development environments than production in this moment. Regards Pavel > > -- > Robert Haas > EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
