Robert Haas <> writes:
> I thought about adjusting it, but I didn't see what it made sense to
> adjust it to.  It still is the parameter used for parameter I/O and
> parsing/planning, so the existing text isn't wrong.  It will possibly
> also get reused for execution, but the previous statement has a
> lengthy comment on that, so it didn't seem worth recapitulating here.

Ah yes, the previous comment is not far away, so it's easy to read it
that way.  Agreed.

> Actually, I did, but the change was in the second patch file attached
> to the same email, which maybe you missed?  Combined patch attached.

Oops, I missed it, yes.  Looks good to me.

Dimitri Fontaine     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to