On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 06:00, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 6:26 PM, David E. Wheeler <da...@kineticode.com> > wrote: >> +1, though I think the core type will at least need some basic operators and >> indexing support. > > And I'm willing to do that, but I thought it best to submit a bare > bones patch first, in the hopes of minimizing the number of > objectionable things therein. For example, if you want to be able to > index a JSON column, you have to decide on some collation order that > is consistent with JSON's notion of equality, and it's not obvious > what is most logical. Heck, equality itself isn't 100% obvious. If > there's adequate support for including JSON in core, and nobody > objects to my implementation, then I'll throw some ideas for those > things up against the wall and see what sticks.
+1 for getting the basics in first, and then adding more to it later. There's still a fair amount of time to do that for 9.2, but not if we get stuck bikeshedding again... -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
