Tom Lane wrote: > Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > For all intent and purpose, pg_index.indisprimary can be added to that > > list. Can't make a primary key without a pg_constraint entry. > > I disagree. For one thing, there are clients that look at that column. > There's no percentage in breaking them to gain zero (and it will be > zero, because of alignment considerations...)
Yes, pgaccess uses it, as I remember. Would be nice if it was accurate. > > indisclustered is currently pretty useless, but may become less so > if CLUSTER gets upgraded to usefulness, so I'm not in favor of deleting > that either. Yea, I can see that being useful some day. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
