Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> writes:
> 2011/12/23 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
>> Tomas Vondra <t...@fuzzy.cz> writes:
>>> The motivation for this patch was that collection timing data often
>>> causes performance issues and in some cases it's not needed. But is this
>>> true for row counts?
>> Perhaps more to the point, is there a use case for collecting timing
>> data without row counts? I find it hard to visualize a valid reason.
> yes - a searching of bad prediction
No, because timing alone proves nothing at all. The machine could just
have been overloaded.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
