On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, because it doesn't operate on strings. > > I argued when we added string_agg that it ought to be called > concat_agg, or something like that, but I got shouted down. So now > here we are.
+1. Using the input type names to name the function is a mistake and should be stopped...enough. It's verbose and unnecessary...everything else in sql is heavily overloaded (we don't have int_max() and float_max()). merlin -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
