Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Um ... timings of what?
> Apologies for being terse, no problem to give a full explanation. But you still didn't. I wanted to know what those numbers were and how they show that there's not a performance regression. Presumably you meant that some were "before" and some "after", but they were not so labeled. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers