Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > You forgot to attach the patch, but the approach seems totally > Rube Goldberg to me anyway. Why not just fix heap_update/ > heap_delete to return the additional information? It's not like > we don't whack their parameter lists around regularly. OK. > Rather than having three output parameters to support the case, > I'm a bit inclined to merge them into a single-purpose struct > type. But that's mostly cosmetic. OK. Working on v5. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
