Excerpts from Daniel Farina's message of dom ene 15 08:41:55 -0300 2012: > Onto the mechanism: the patch is both a contrib and changes to > Postgres. The changes to postgres are mechanical in nature, but > voluminous. The key change is to not only remember the position of > Const nodes in the query tree, but also their length, and this change > is really extensive although repetitive. It was this swathe of change > that bitrotted the source, when new references to some flex constructs > were added. Every such reference has needs to explicitly refer to > '.begins', which is the beginning position of the const -- this used > to be the only information tracked. Because .length was never > required by postgres in the past, it fastidiously bookkeeps that > information without ever referring to it internally: only > pg_stat_statements does.
I wonder if it would make sense to split out those changes from the patch, including a one-member struct definition to the lexer source, which could presumably be applied in advance of the rest of the patch. That way, if other parts of the main patch are contentious, the tree doesn't drift under you. (Or rather, it still drifts, but you no longer care because your bits are already in.) -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
