On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Alexander Korotkov

> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <
> heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>> Apart from that, the multibyte issue seems like the big one. Any way
>>> around that?
>> Conversion of pg_wchar to multibyte character is the only way I found to
> avoid serious hacking of existing regexp code. Do you think additional
> function in pg_wchar_tbl which converts pg_wchar back to multibyte
> character is possible solution?
Do you have any notes on it? I could make the patch which adds such
function into core.

With best regards,
Alexander Korotkov.

Reply via email to