On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Alexander Korotkov <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Heikki Linnakangas < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Apart from that, the multibyte issue seems like the big one. Any way >>> around that? >> >> Conversion of pg_wchar to multibyte character is the only way I found to > avoid serious hacking of existing regexp code. Do you think additional > function in pg_wchar_tbl which converts pg_wchar back to multibyte > character is possible solution? > Do you have any notes on it? I could make the patch which adds such function into core. ------ With best regards, Alexander Korotkov.
