2012/1/21 Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com>: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Kohei KaiGai <kai...@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote: >>>>> I guess you concerned about that expected/select_views_1.out is >>>>> patched, not expected/select_views.out. >>>>> I'm not sure the reason why regression test script tries to make diff >>>>> between results/select_views and expected/select_views_1.out. >>>> >>>> select_views.out and select_views_1.out are alternate expected output >>>> files. The regression tests pass if the actual output matches either >>>> one. Thus, you have to patch both. >>>> >>> It was new for me. The attached patch updates both of the expected >>> files, however, I'm not certain whether select_view.out is suitable, or >>> not, because my results/select_view.out matched with >>> expected/select_view_1.out. >> >> Committed. We'll see what the buildfarm thinks. > > This passes installcheck initially. Then upon second invocation of > installcheck, it fails. > > It creates the role "alice", and doesn't clean it up. On next > invocation alice already exists and cases a failure in test > select_views. > Thanks for your pointing out.
The attached patch adds cleaning-up part of object being defined within this test; includes user "alice". Thanks, -- KaiGai Kohei <kai...@kaigai.gr.jp>
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers