On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> So, having received feedback from Tom and others in relation to this > patch, I would like to state how I think I should go about addressing > various concerns to ensure that a revision of the patch gets into the > 9.2 release. As I've said time and again, I think that it is very > important that we have this, sooner rather than later. Nothing can be ensured completely, but I would add this is a very important feature. Without it, large systems without prepared statements are mostly untunable and therefore untuned, which is a bad thing. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
