Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Jim Nasby <j...@nasby.net> wrote:
>> We should also look at having the freelist do something useful, instead of
>> just dropping it completely. Unfortunately that's probably more work...
> That's kinda my feeling as well. The free list in its current form is
> pretty much useless, but I don't think we'll save much by getting rid
> of it, because that's just a single test. The expensive part of what
> we do while holding BufFreelistLock is, I think, iterating through
> buffers taking and releasing a spinlock on each one (!).
Yeah ... spinlocks that, by definition, will be uncontested. So I think
it would be advisable to prove rather than just assume that that's a
problem.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
