On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think that this would be a lot more clear if we described this as > synchronous_commit = remote_write rather than just synchronous_commit > = write. Actually, the internal constant is named that way already, > but it's not exposed as such to the user. That's something to discuss at the end of the CF when people are less busy and we get more input. It's an easy change whatever we decide to do. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
