"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> But you *didn't* make sure it would never be a problem.
> Wasn't I looping until I found a unique name?
My point was that there could still be a conflict against a user column
that the user tries to create *later*. So it's illusory to think that
making the name of a dropped column less predictable will improve
matters.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
