2012/2/2 Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net>: > > > On 02/02/2012 04:35 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote: >> >> At 2012-02-01 18:48:28 -0500, andrew.duns...@pgexperts.com wrote: >>> >>> For now I'm inclined not to proceed with that, and leave it as an >>> optimization to be considered later if necessary. Thoughts? >> >> I agree, there doesn't seem to be a pressing need to do it now. >> > > > OK, here's my final version of the patch for constructor functions. If > there's no further comment I'll go with this.
These function are super, Thank you Do you plan to fix a issue with row attribute names in 9.2? Regards Pavel > > cheers > > andrew > > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
