Can anybody with a win64 build reproduce the misbehavior reported in bug #6460? I'm not currently interested in the question of whether my_log2 ought to be changed --- the question rather is why is the system not noticing that his shared_buffers value overflows size_t.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
