Peter Geoghegan <pe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > Another look around shows that the CoerceToDomain struct takes its > location from the new Const location in turn, so my dirty little hack > will break the location of the CoerceToDomain struct, giving an > arguably incorrect caret position in some error messages. It would > suit me if MyCoerceToDomain->arg (or the "arg" of a similar node > related to coercion, like CoerceViaIO) pointed to a Const node with, > potentially, and certainly in the case of my original CoerceToDomain > test case, a distinct location to the coercion node itself.
Sorry, I'm not following. What about that isn't true already? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers