Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: > Returning to the original point, I've come to the conclusion that > "pure" isn't the right way to go. The trouble with "leakproof" is > that it doesn't point to what it is that's not leaking, which is > information rather than memory, as many might imagine (and I did) > without further hints. I'm not sure any single English word would > be as descriptive as I'd like. Discreet? http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/discreet I guess the risk is that people would confuse it with "discrete". -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
