Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: > On tor, 2012-02-23 at 10:17 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> void * seems entirely reasonable given the two different usages, but >> I would be happier if the patch added explicit casts whereever FH is >> set to or used as one of these two types.
> That would add about 70 casts all over the place. I don't think that > will make things clearer or more robust. I think we either leave it as > my first patch for now or find a more robust solution with a union or > something. Hm. Could we just create two separate fields? It's not real clear to me that forcing both these usages into a generic pointer buys much. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers