Excerpts from Noah Misch's message of jue ene 26 12:00:49 -0300 2012:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:39:56PM -0500, Noah Misch wrote:
> > In any event, the patch needed a rebase, so I've attached it rebased and 
> > with
> > that comment edited to reference ri_GenerateQualCollation(), that being the
> > most-relevant source for the assumption in question.
> Commit 9d35116611e6a1fc10f2298944fbf0e4e1a826be invalidated the test case 
> hunks
> again.  We'll need to either remove the test cases, as Robert chose to do for
> that other patch, or bolster them per
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20120126115536.GD15670%40tornado.leadboat.com

Committed, removing the tests.

I also chose to update catversion, even though I can't figure out how to
make a Constraint node be stored anywhere.  Maybe it's not even
possible, but then I thought maybe I'm just lacking imagination.


Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to