Excerpts from Noah Misch's message of jue ene 26 12:00:49 -0300 2012: > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:39:56PM -0500, Noah Misch wrote: > > In any event, the patch needed a rebase, so I've attached it rebased and > > with > > that comment edited to reference ri_GenerateQualCollation(), that being the > > most-relevant source for the assumption in question. > > Commit 9d35116611e6a1fc10f2298944fbf0e4e1a826be invalidated the test case > hunks > again. We'll need to either remove the test cases, as Robert chose to do for > that other patch, or bolster them per > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20120126115536.GD15670%40tornado.leadboat.com
Committed, removing the tests. I also chose to update catversion, even though I can't figure out how to make a Constraint node be stored anywhere. Maybe it's not even possible, but then I thought maybe I'm just lacking imagination. Thanks! -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
