On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > But it is very effective at avoiding 4 out of the 5 writes you mention.
For the "common case," would we not want to have (1) [WAL] and (2) [Writing the pre-frozen tuple]? If we only write the tuple (2), and don't capture WAL, then the COPY wouldn't be replicable, right? -- When confronted by a difficult problem, solve it by reducing it to the question, "How would the Lone Ranger handle this?" -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
