Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> writes:
> Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of jue mar 01 12:00:08 -0300 2012:
>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I confess I am nervous about ripping this out. I am pretty sure we
>> will get complaints about it. Performance optimizations that benefit
>> group A at the expense of group B are always iffy, and I'm not sure
>> the case of using an array as a path indicator is as uncommon as you
>> seem to think.
> Maybe we should keep it as an option.
How would we make it optional? There's noplace I can think of to stick
such a knob ...
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
