2012/3/2 Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net>: >> with renaming to dblink_fdw_validator? > > Well, it's not the validator of the dblink_fdw, so maybe something like > basic_postgresql_fdw_validator.
-1 for same reason. It's not the validator of basic_postgresql_fdw. Using "fdw" in the name of validator which doesn't have actual FDW might confuse users. Rather dblink_validator or libpq_option_validator is better? One possible another idea is creating dblink_fdw which uses the validator during "CREATE EXTENSION dblink" for users who store connection information in FDW objects. -- Shigeru Hanada -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
