Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Uh, we've *never* supported "two bruce users" ... > > > He was being tricky by having different passwords for the same user on > > each database, so one user couldn't get into the other database, even > > though it was the same name. > > But the system didn't realize they were two different users. (Try > dropping just one of them.) And what if they happened to choose the > same password? I think this is a fragile kluge not a supported feature. > > > The question is whether using those secondary > > passwords is widespread enough that I need to get that into the code > > too. It was pretty confusing for users, so I am hesitant to re-add it, > > but I hate for Marc to lose functionality he had in the past. > > I'd like to think of a better answer, not put back that same kluge. > Ideas anyone?
Agreed. A clear kludge. I just feel guilty because I removed it. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
