On tor, 2012-03-08 at 10:49 +0100, Albe Laurenz wrote: > Actually, I did when I reviewed the patch the first time round. > I think that the checks implemented are clearly good and useful, > since any problem reported will lead to an error at runtime if > a certain code path in the function is taken.
Shouldn't the validator just reject the function in those cases? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
