W dniu 2012-03-09 16:55, Merlin Moncure pisze: > On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Kohei KaiGai <kai...@kaigai.gr.jp> > wrote: >> 2012/3/6 Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com>: >>> It seems to me that the only thing that needs core support is >>> the ability to start up the daemon when postmaster is ready to >>> accept queries, and shut the daemon down when postmaster kills >>> backends (either because one crashed, or because it's shutting >>> down). >>> >> So, although my motivation is not something like Cron in core, it >> seems to me Alvaro's idea is quite desirable and reasonable, to >> be discussed in v9.3. > > 100% agree (having re-read the thread and Alvaro's idea having > sunk in). Being able to set up daemon processes side by side with > the postmaster would fit the bill nicely. It's pretty interesting > to think of all the places you could go with it. > > merlin
Good to hear that (I hope that even though English is not my native language I understand properly posts in this thread). I am convinced, that all of You will be pround of the new solution like a "heart bit" for PostgreSQL. May be it is too poetic but considering cron or pgAgent instead real job manager is like considering defibrillator instead a real heart. Currently, especially in web applications, the idea is not where to store a data but how a data can flow and how *fast*. "It's pretty interesting to think of all the places you could go with it." - in fact it is :) Best regards, Artur -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
