Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes:
> On ons, 2012-03-14 at 17:16 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> If a constraint is NOT ENFORCED, then the query planner presumably
>> won't rely on it for planning purposes 

> Why do you presume that?

What does SQL:2011 say exactly about the semantics of NOT ENFORCED?
Is an implementation allowed to fail in undefined ways if a constraint
is marked NOT ENFORCED and is not actually true?

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to