Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I see that patch has not made it to any released versions yet.
>> Is it too late to rethink the design? I propose (a) redefining it
>> as committing after every N objects, and (b) having a limit of 1000
>> or so objects by default.
> I'll dispute the characterization of "utterly brain-dead"; it's better
> than what we had before, which was nothing. However, I think your
> proposal might be better still.
Not hearing any objections, I will go make that happen.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
