On Wednesday, March 21, 2012 03:47:23 PM Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mié mar 21 11:35:54 -0300 2012: > > Now that would all be fine if this were a widely-desired feature, but > > AFAIR the user demand for it has been about nil. So I'm leaning to > > the position that we don't want it. > > I disagree with there being zero interest ... the "order by random()" > stuff does come up occasionally. Yes.
I wonder if could be hacked ontop of a plain seqscan node instead of building a completely separate infrastructure. The standards syntax would then simply be transformed into a select with some special ORDER BY Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
