Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> ... My own opinion is > >> that there is nothing broken there; certainly nothing so broken that > >> we need to force a change under schedule pressure. > > > I don't feel we are under pressure. We have time to discuss and address > > it. > > Well, it's all a matter of how you look at it. Isn't the point of your > post that began this thread to start giving people a sense of time > pressure? > > I agree that if we could quickly come to a resolution about how this > ought to work, there's plenty of time to go off and implement it. But > (1) we failed to come to a consensus before, so I'm not optimistic > than one will suddenly emerge now; (2) we've got a ton of other issues > that we *need* to deal with before beta. This one does not strike me > as a must-fix, and so I'm loathe to spend much development time on it > when there are so many open issues.
Well, it is up to the individuals involved. If someone wants to deal with it, and gets a consensus, and comes up with a patch, let them. The list is for time pressure on those items. It does not affect new items. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
